Government & Nonprofit
How AI-ready is fda.gov?
39/100 — Poor. Failing most of the checks that decide whether AI can read and trust the site. Measured by the same checks as our free tools, from the public homepage of fda.gov on 2026-07-12.
In Government & Nonprofit: #33 of 33 scored sites.
What the numbers mean
AI readiness is how cleanly an LLM fetcher or crawler can read the page: server-rendered main content, one clear H1, a meta description, structured data (JSON-LD), an explicit robots.txt policy for AI crawlers, llms.txt and agent signals. HTTP security covers the response headers browsers rely on: HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, frame and referrer policies, secure cookies. Both are 0–100 with explainable, weighted checks; the composite weights them 55/45.
A high score doesn’t mean AI recommends the brand — it means AI can read it. Whether assistants actually name it when buyers ask is a different measurement: share of voice over time, which Crawlsonar tracks.
Others in Government & Nonprofit
Full leaderboard →Check your own site
Same checks, your domain, in about a minute — with the evidence and the fixes.
Snapshot generated 2026-07-12 from the public homepage; scores change when the site changes. Crawlsonar reports on public data and is not affiliated with fda.gov. Site owners: [email protected].